Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AsiaPac International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:44, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

AsiaPac International

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I do not understand how this company is notable in anyway. Lack of reliable sources, not to mention the article is a stub. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 22:37, 30 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 13:59, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 12 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete If it weren't already here, I'd have considered A7. DGG ( talk ) 05:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 22:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.