Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asia Pacific World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice . Can be recreated or restored by a request to WP:REFUND. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Asia Pacific World

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Rather new journal, not notable yet. No third party sources, not indexed in any major selective databases (the only database in which it is currently included is the "Bibliography of Asian Studies"). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Abstain. I can't bring myself to vote 'delete' on a journal, but Crusio makes a pretty good case. So I'm here to provide moral support for the journal and for Crusio, and I'll sit here on the fence, whistling Dixie. BTW, Crusio, many thanks for the good work you've done on the other contributions by the soon-to-be-blocked creator of this one. Drmies (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.