Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salvio giuliano 21:37, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Asian-Australasian Journal of Bioscience and Biotechnology

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article deleted after PROD with reason "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources discussing the journal in-depth (several don't even mention the journal). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.". Article restored upon request by creator, without reason given. PROD reason still stands, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 10:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 10:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only sources which discuss this journal in detail seem to be press releases, and it fails WP:NJOURNAL. WJ94 (talk) 16:26, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear WJ94,,
 * Thank you very much for your comment. I don't think they are just some press release, as press release focused on a particular topic, here all of the featured news are comparatively extended and elaborated.
 * I have studeid the WP:JOURNAL Criterias. The journal meets,
 * -Criterion 1
 * -Criterion 2
 * -G.b)
 * -Criterion 1 (C1): 1.a); In Google scholar, it contains 383 citations, so far and h-index: 10. As the number of published articles are low the citations received are not high.
 * -Criterion 2 (C2): 2.a) National newspaper coverage
 * -2.b): Indexed in Chemical Abstract (according to it's nature); h-index: 10; i10-index: 11
 * -Criterion 3 (C3): 3.a)
 * As this is a STEM journal, it does not cover historical object.
 * Thank you very much again.
 * Asifupm22 (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is no evidence of notability Almeida Fernando (talk) 23:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Almeida Fernando,
 * Thank you very much for your comment. I have studied the Wikipedia notability guidelines. There the main features are,
 * >"Presumed": The journal received significantly reliable coverage by national print media and their news features are so far in-depth. eg,
 * a. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * b. https://www.newagebd.net/article/191631/aajbb-contributes-to-bioscience-tech-research?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * c. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/346240/All-journals-of-Ebu-Press--now-indexed-in--CAS?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * d. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * e. https://www.newagebd.net/article/192604/ebu-press-scientific-journals-included-in-cas?fbclid=IwAR0JUjnN3knrm3rTf08bNBp2rMjzDSPW4nCiorJCrHIaFKrSiSFioavgUJU
 * >Significant coverage": The journal received significant coverage by national (Bangladesh) newspapers. Some articles are cited by recognized journals and they are indexed in Scopus and Web of Science databases.
 * >"Reliable": All of the national daily featured AAJBB are reliable, including, New Age, New Nation, and Agrilife 24.
 * >"Sources": All the mentioned sources in wiki article are secondary.
 * >"Independent of the subject": News, a,b,c,d,e are completely focused on the in-depth journal's history and workflow.
 * Thank you very much.
 * Asifupm22 (talk) 22:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete In passing mentions and regurgitated press releases don't meet WP:SIRS. Rhadow (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Rhadow,
 * Thank you very much for your comment. I have studied the WP: SIRS guidelines of Wikipedia. It said,
 * "1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth."
 * -So far this journal received news coverage with some main articles here,
 * a. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * b. https://www.newagebd.net/article/191631/aajbb-contributes-to-bioscience-tech-research?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * c. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/346240/All-journals-of-Ebu-Press--now-indexed-in--CAS?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * d. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * e. https://www.newagebd.net/article/192604/ebu-press-scientific-journals-included-in-cas?fbclid=IwAR0JUjnN3knrm3rTf08bNBp2rMjzDSPW4nCiorJCrHIaFKrSiSFioavgUJU
 * All of the newspapers featured the news has Bangladeshi national coverage.
 * "2. Be completely independent of the article subject."
 * -The news covered journal activities along with the publishing work. As this is the Wikipedia page regarding a journal, so I did not focus the other activities of the journal.
 * "3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source."
 * -As I told above, all of the newspapers are highly reliable and nationwide circulated newspaper.
 * "4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability."
 * - All of the references sources are reliable and secondary.
 * Thank you very much again.
 * Asifupm22 (talk) 22:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Repeating yourself six times does not make your argument any more convincing. There is no foundation article that "Contain[s] significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth."  As far as I concerned, neither this journal nor the publishing house are notable.  I agree with the editor who opined on a sister journal, "Not even close to meeting either WP:NJournals or WP:GNG." Rhadow (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per above: the article currently fails WP:GNG and WP:NJOURNAL. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 19:14, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear InterstellarGamer12321,
 * Thank you very much for your comment. I have studied the WP:NJOURNAL and WP:GNG.
 * The journal meets WP:NJOURNAL,
 * -Criterion 1
 * -Criterion 2
 * -G.b)
 * -Criterion 1 (C1): 1.a); In Google scholar, it contains 383 citations, so far and h-index: 10. As the number of published articles are low the citations received are not high.
 * -Criterion 2 (C2): 2.a) National newspaper coverage
 * -2.b): Indexed in Chemical Abstract (according to it's nature); h-index: 10; i10-index: 11
 * -Criterion 3 (C3): 3.a)
 * As this is a STEM journal, it does not cover historical object.
 * The main features of WP:GNG are,
 * >"Presumed": The journal received significantly reliable coverage by national print media and their news features are so far in-depth. eg,
 * a. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * b. https://www.newagebd.net/article/191631/aajbb-contributes-to-bioscience-tech-research?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * c. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/346240/All-journals-of-Ebu-Press--now-indexed-in--CAS?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * d. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * e. https://www.newagebd.net/article/192604/ebu-press-scientific-journals-included-in-cas?fbclid=IwAR0JUjnN3knrm3rTf08bNBp2rMjzDSPW4nCiorJCrHIaFKrSiSFioavgUJU
 * >Significant coverage": The journal received significant coverage by national (Bangladesh) newspapers. Some articles are cited by recognized journals and they are indexed in Scopus and Web of Science databases.
 * >"Reliable": All of the national daily featured AAJBB are reliable, including, New Age, New Nation, and Agrilife 24.
 * >"Sources": All the mentioned sources in wiki article are secondary.
 * >"Independent of the subject": News, a,b,c,d,e are completely focused on the in-depth journal's history and workflow.
 * Thank you very much again.
 * Asifupm22 (talk) 22:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can't see how this passes either NJOURNAL or GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 19:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Onel5969,
 * Thank you very much for your comment. I have studied the WP:NJOURNAL and WP:GNG.
 * The journal meets WP:NJOURNAL,
 * -Criterion 1
 * -Criterion 2
 * -G.b)
 * -Criterion 1 (C1): 1.a); In Google scholar, it contains 383 citations, so far and h-index: 10. As the number of published articles are low the citations received are not high.
 * -Criterion 2 (C2): 2.a) National newspaper coverage
 * -2.b): Indexed in Chemical Abstract (according to it's nature); h-index: 10; i10-index: 11
 * -Criterion 3 (C3): 3.a)
 * As this is a STEM journal, it does not cover historical object.
 * The main features of WP:GNG are,
 * >"Presumed": The journal received significantly reliable coverage by national print media and their news features are so far in-depth. eg,
 * a. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * b. https://www.newagebd.net/article/191631/aajbb-contributes-to-bioscience-tech-research?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * c. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/346240/All-journals-of-Ebu-Press--now-indexed-in--CAS?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * d. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * e. https://www.newagebd.net/article/192604/ebu-press-scientific-journals-included-in-cas?fbclid=IwAR0JUjnN3knrm3rTf08bNBp2rMjzDSPW4nCiorJCrHIaFKrSiSFioavgUJU
 * >Significant coverage": The journal received significant coverage by national (Bangladesh) newspapers. Some articles are cited by recognized journals and they are indexed in Scopus and Web of Science databases.
 * >"Reliable": All of the national daily featured AAJBB are reliable, including, New Age, New Nation, and Agrilife 24.
 * >"Sources": All the mentioned sources in wiki article are secondary.
 * >"Independent of the subject": News, a,b,c,d,e are completely focused on the in-depth journal's history and workflow.
 * Thank you very much again.
 * Asifupm22 (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom fails WP:NJOURNAL and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Pharaoh of the Wizards,
 * Thank you very much for your comment. I have studied the WP:NJOURNAL and WP:GNG.
 * The journal meets WP:NJOURNAL,
 * -Criterion 1
 * -Criterion 2
 * -G.b)
 * -Criterion 1 (C1): 1.a); In Google scholar, it contains 383 citations, so far and h-index: 10. As the number of published articles are low the citations received are not high.
 * -Criterion 2 (C2): 2.a) National newspaper coverage
 * -2.b): Indexed in Chemical Abstract (according to it's nature); h-index: 10; i10-index: 11
 * -Criterion 3 (C3): 3.a)
 * As this is a STEM journal, it does not cover historical object.
 * The main features of WP:GNG are,
 * >"Presumed": The journal received significantly reliable coverage by national print media and their news features are so far in-depth. eg,
 * a. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * b. https://www.newagebd.net/article/191631/aajbb-contributes-to-bioscience-tech-research?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * c. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/346240/All-journals-of-Ebu-Press--now-indexed-in--CAS?fbclid=IwAR0KI093pFDbmUpoV6vqHiQd1Q0N9Iyw9Te4RG9LHkTE8aeqYiskBWrHLSc
 * d. https://thedailynewnation.com/news/344959/AAJBB-contributing-to-bioscience,-biotechnology-research-publication?fbclid=IwAR2VodT7HM-adECYhWMN0P9TmtlASNUEjYNXPvFmV_0OilueT7fEyA5STlE
 * e. https://www.newagebd.net/article/192604/ebu-press-scientific-journals-included-in-cas?fbclid=IwAR0JUjnN3knrm3rTf08bNBp2rMjzDSPW4nCiorJCrHIaFKrSiSFioavgUJU
 * >Significant coverage": The journal received significant coverage by national (Bangladesh) newspapers. Some articles are cited by recognized journals and they are indexed in Scopus and Web of Science databases.
 * >"Reliable": All of the national daily featured AAJBB are reliable, including, New Age, New Nation, and Agrilife 24.
 * >"Sources": All the mentioned sources in wiki article are secondary.
 * >"Independent of the subject": News, a,b,c,d,e are completely focused on the in-depth journal's history and workflow.
 * Thank you very much again.
 * Asifupm22 (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.