Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Boston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Davewild (talk) 09:39, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Asian Boston

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Non-notable magazine. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:59, 18 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 05:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: I recently removed a substantial portion of the article text. The text was copied from here.  Guoguo12  --Talk--  01:14, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to be a legitimate magazine with significant Google coverage. Qworty (talk) 19:34, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Although lacking inline citations, the article shows that the magazine has generated considerable coverage by the Boston Globe, a major news paper and Reliable Source. --MelanieN (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.