Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Institute of Finance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. It's not unanimous, but there appears to solid weight in favor of deletion and the non-delete !votes sound anemic. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Asian Institute of Finance

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. The listed "articles" are mere mentions and many are not independent of the subject. This has been a problematic article for years. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 22:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 22:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment May be a weak keep? Not sure about this one! There does seem to be some references for it, but certainly not from obvious reputable RS.Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The references fail the criteria to establish notability (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND) and fails GNG. -- HighKing ++ 12:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG, CORPDEPTH. Most references are either not directly related to this subject or of questionable reliability. South Nashua (talk) 18:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete' yeah, there's no sourcing here. Drmies (talk) 01:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment page updated. Articles updated independent of subject and from reputable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandrapriya (talk • contribs) — Sandrapriya (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * , no they were not. It seems you do not understand the difference between primary and secondary sources--this encyclopedia needs to be built on secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 17:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.