Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Journal of International Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Asian Journal of International Law

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-Notable Journal based on the fact that it is not due to be published until 2011 Codf1977 (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:CRYSTAL, without prejudice for recreation if and when 1) the journal is actually published, and 2) has indicia of notability. TJRC (talk) 18:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I proposed the article for inclusion and would propose to keep it. The Journal is to be launched formally later in June and is the first regional journal of its kind for Asia. (There are, by contrast, an American Journal of International Law and a European Journal of International Law . Its connection to the new Asian Society of International Law make it, I believe, a notable development in scholarship and international law for Asia. Tempwikisc (talk) 01:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * But it doesn't even exist yet. The American Journal of International Law has been published for over a hundred years. TJRC (talk) 02:08, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Revised launch date now posted with link to newly active Cambridge site. First articles to be pre-published by end of June. Tempwikisc (talk) 08:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, consider recreating the article after publication (not pre-publication) if and when you have evidence of notability. TJRC (talk) 02:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks for taking the time to respond. I'm new to Wikipedia so this is appreciated. Tempwikisc (talk) 13:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.