Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Rich List


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 06:55, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Asian Rich List

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This was deleted as an expired prod, then recreated. Basically, no context and pointless. JuJube 08:09, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The creator was recently blocked for recreating non-notable articles. JuJube 08:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence it's encyclopaedic. Guy (Help!) 11:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as either spam or a copyvio - it's commercial publication and the article is a copy of material on the publication's website. andy 13:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability established. Plus, as Guy said, no evidence that it's encyclopedic. Acalamari 18:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep & Source If this article is sourced I see no reason why it shouldn't be kept as a stub. Deletion should be a last resort for articles that contain only adverts, info about completely unnotable persons etc., not for everything that isn't in one's personal scope. Malc82 23:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.