Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Seminary of Christian Ministries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:46, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Asian Seminary of Christian Ministries

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable organisation which fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Sounds entirely like an advertisement, no references, irrelevant/non-notable fact and heavy NPOV. Previously speedy deleted by User:Panyd, re-created 3 times by User talk:W.bayola. Prods deleted without actual action. Mainly no sources that can be found to make it pass WP:GNG, and perhaps the creator has COI (not that I can prove that). &theta;v&xi;r    mag&xi;   contribs 19:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 22:36, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Fully accredited accredited tertiary institution. StAnselm (talk) 02:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as an accredited tertiary institution. There's not as much English-language coverage on the web as I would like, but it is after all in the Philippines. -- 202.124.75.46 (talk) 11:28, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * A great majority of Philippine coverage is in English. If there's no English coverage, don't expect coverage on other local languages. – H T  D  13:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, but the web coverage I do see suggests there's more stuff offline. And we tend to keep US equivalents of this institution, per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. -- 202.124.73.133 (talk) 23:26, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I dunno if the government licenses this institution, as it is purely a religious one, and the government officially doesn't mess around with curricula of seminaries and the like. That means we don't know if it's accredited by the government other than being registered in the SEC (if it is indeed registered). – H T  D  16:49, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep -- As with the Graduate school also under discussion currently, this is an accredited tertiary insttiution. Unfortunately, the number of students is not clear, but I would suggest that all such institutions offering muliple courses are parobably notable, just as we seem to have accepted that all High Schools are notable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 11:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Among the thousands of Google hits is some local coverage, and material on their involvement with Bible translation activities. And if US high schools are notable, than this surely is. -- 202.124.75.204 (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.