Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asite Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:14, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Asite Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Software-as-a-Service company with no evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth 13:44, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Sounds a bit non-notable to me, and should have a bit more sources, I think. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 14:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Jeremjay  24  ''' 14:31, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I wrote the original believing Asite to be notable. As recent edits to the intro emphasise, it has pioneered some software advances, notably in the area of Building Information Modelling. It was the only company of its type listed on AIM. Its first chairman (Sir John Egan) and its major shareholder, Robert Tchenguiz, are certainly notable - and, in my opinion and in the latter context - it is notable that this business has accumulated substantial losses since its establishment (I will edit the article to make these points, adding references).Paul W (talk) 08:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable online business, obviously promotional in tone and intent: providing web-based electronic project management, project extranet, or construction collaboration technologies...... - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.