Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AskGamblers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arguably eligible for CSD A7 as there appears to be no claim to significance in the article. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

AskGamblers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable website that fails to meet either WP:NWEB or WP:GNG. SmartSE (talk) 14:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  15:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  15:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as I tagged it for further sourcing and the current article is simply seeming not yet convincing enough. SwisterTwister   talk  05:33, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable website fails WP:WEB and WP:SIGCOV.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:56, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.