Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ask Amberly Jane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Ask Amberly Jane
This article is about an advice column written in a student newspaper. It was originally nominated for speedy but I changed it to prod as it didn't meet anyt of the speedy criteria. An anonymous editor removed the prod notice so it is here. It has no verifiable sources online see as they are either the newspaper or Wikipedia and/or mirrors. Delete Capitalistroadster 00:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly, Redirect. The The Stony Brook Press already mentions the column, and that is probably all it deserves. Gw e rnol 00:39, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No redirect needed, I think. --Jadriaen 01:00, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable student newspaper column. Zaxem 01:03, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - No. 1 GHit is the wikipedia article &mdash; ßottesiηi  Tell me what's up 02:59, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly merge into SBP article. ~Kylu ( u | t )  03:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No more notable than any other student newspaper column.  If it wins major awards, picks up a national syndicate, etc., then I'll reconsider. --Ataricodfish 03:13, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Stony Brook Press, where a section already exists for it. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 03:58, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn newspaper. Funnybunny (talk/QRVS) 04:25, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  04:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If this was a major newspaper, I'd change my mind.  But maybe this can be merged into the article on the campus paper? ---J.S (t|c) 06:01, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into the newspaper article. No need for redirect. Tyrenius 06:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge in to The Stony Brook Press and delete.  (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:43, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to the newspaper. J I P  | Talk 08:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol merge vote.svg|20px]] Merge per above +Hexagon1 (talk) [[Image:Flag of Australia.svg|30px]] 09:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. --Sunfazer | Talk 10:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|20px]] Delete non-notable and only relevant for a very limited time period jnothman talk 11:32, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge into paper and then delete. Decidedly non-notable -- AlexR 11:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete since the paper itself is probably going to get deleted too sooner or later. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:29, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, parent newspaper already mentions the article; not sure there's much more needed than that. Kuru   talk  13:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 13:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. --Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  15:37, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - a mention may be appropriate in the newspaper article but not a complete merge. ...Scott5114 19:20, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol delete vote.svg|20px]] Delete sexcruft, don't merge. The paper is barely notable itself (bi-weekly student newspaper). Just zis Guy you know? 20:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with The Stony Brook Press, no redirect. Rjm656s 23:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge in agreement with others above. --Dan 08:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and smerge into The Stony Brook Press if felt necessary. LjL 21:28, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.