Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asker International School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__.  Sandstein  18:15, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Asker International School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Clearly no sign of notability. Fails WP: SCH Otuọcha (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Schools,  and Norway. Otuọcha (talk) 14:29, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Schools should pass WP:GNG/WP:NSCHOOL. WP:SCH is a failed proposal. A WP:BEFORE search has a lot of hits for primary sources. Better sources may exist in Norwegian language. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'll add that this nomination for deletion was made 4 minutes after the page was created. Although it would be great if pages were created with enough sources to show notability, I think more time should be given and a discussion opened on the - as yet uncreated - talk page regarding notability per WP:DEMOLISH before rushing to AfD. AfD asks editors to spend a lot more than 4 minutes each in evaluating sources, and sometimes it can be avoided with an in page source discussion. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: Sources about the various localities of the school, since it has grown so much during its first ten years Geschichte (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I am currently writing and contributing to the article. I believe it would be beneficial to revisit the article after a few days for a thorough review. If it meets the notability criteria, it can be safeguarded from deletion. HimSur9 (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Dont worry, it can be striked since it's based on consensus. Per research, the subject meets no notability. Otuọcha (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: The current sources are too much of a mishmash, with too many primary sources. Geschichte (talk) 22:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I see only primary sources. notability guidelines for organizations won't allow to qualify this page as notable. NiLok223 (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete due to lack of sourcing. Cortador (talk) 06:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: To the article creator - it seems that you unfortunately have placed too much emphasis on the internal workings of the school, where you should have focused more on the political discussions about the school, if Asker should have such a school and where it should be located. This would have shown political relevance and ramifications. Nobody cares if they have a playground. You have unfortunately found sources via a search engine, which differ wildly both in quality and whether they are even desirable as sources on Wikipedia at all. This article could have been saved, but I don't have the time. Geschichte (talk) 10:30, 15 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.