Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aslı Çukurkavaklı


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject fails to meet WP:Hockey, and that extant sourcing does not meet WP:GNG. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  19:09, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Aslı Çukurkavaklı

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:HOCKEY. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep: Passes WP:GNG. Failure to pass WP:HOCKEY is irrelevant given the WP:GNG issues. The major issue here is while there are a lot of sources about Çukurkavaklı, most of them are in Turkish.  6 of these are cited in the article.  Some one more familiar with the Turkish language can probably do a better job at picking these sources out, and adding information to them to the article. But the strength of their existence alone, albeit not in the English language, demonstrates WP:GNG passing. --LauraHale (talk) 12:44, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: Definitely fails NHOCKEY. 's assertion that the number of sources indicates notability is incorrect as the sources (those of which that are not broken links such as #4) are still readable even with a simple translation such as those available through Google Translate. The Turkish sources only have passing mentions of her and are mostly of the WP:ROUTINE game coverage variety and two stats pages. The only one talking about her is this one (used twice as sources #2 and #5), but even that is very brief and more about what the players' backgrounds are when they are not competing. I see no significant coverage, Turkish or otherwise, that indicates the subject passes GNG, specifically criterion #1: "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Yosemiter (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: per Yosemiter, to whom I'm grateful for doing the legwork on a couple of these AfDs so that I don't have to do so. I remain dismayed that LauraHale is pulling knee-jerk Keeps on these Turkish women's hockey articles without coming up with a single cite that meets the GNG's requirements, and is notably silent when asked to identify specific cites she claims does.   Ravenswing   01:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication of GNG. Sources are all databases, stat sites or brief routine mentions. Furthermore, I'm seeing most of the information in the article being garnered from primary sources. Fenix down (talk) 07:38, 18 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.