Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asoke K. Talukder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Asoke K. Talukder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very promotional article, without a single in-depth source. Searches turned up virtually zero in-depth coverage so fails WP:GNG, and also does not meet WP:NSCHOLAR. He's accomplished, simply not notable. There also might be a COI issue with the editor who created the article, since the photo in the article was their own work.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:30, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I think you are correct about the COI and will warn the article creator as a prelude to possible draftifying. Deb (talk) 11:15, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I thought about draftifying, but in my WP:BEFORE didn't really find enough to show notability.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 11:46, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The creator seems to be a very occasional editor. If we draftify it and he doesn't improve it, it will be deleted after a certain length of time in any case. Some of his other creations don't bear much scrutiny either. I'll leave it a couple of days before deciding what to do about this one, just in case someone else comes up with some better content. Deb (talk) 14:37, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Szzuk (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Spiderone  09:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG as well as NSCHOLAR, comprehensively. &#x222F; WBG converse 09:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.