Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asot Corporation

Quote: "The Asot Corporation is a largely fictitious organization founded by two Pennsylvania kids in search of a label to apply to their activities." Quite endearing, but utterly non-noteable. Maybe a suitable topic for the family chronicles of the families Seaman and Troutman in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, but not for Wikipedia. Delete. Lupo 14:42, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Addendum: also not verifiable, and it's breeding categories now... Lupo 14:45, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. This isn't the way to get your name in lights.  Geogre 16:01, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, along with any associated trivial categories. - Fennec (&#12399;&#12373;&#12400;&#12367;&#12398;&#12365;&#12388;&#12397;) 16:29, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Tried to get that speedy deleted as nonsense. Delete all and consider blocking user. - Lucky 6.9 16:44, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Loaded up the now-deleted page. It's vanity, bordering on nonsense. What is with 20-year olds making stupid vanity pages? -- Cyrius|&#9998; 19:04, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * This is what was e-mailed to me... - user:zanimum
 * "I have thoroughly read the "What Wikipedia Is Not" guide a few times, and I have found no guideline which would exclude the rather neutral entry that I wrote covering this topic. In fact, the entry does fit into the “Not a Paper Encyclopedia” category. The entry is objective and non-promotional. I understand that the appeal of such a discussion may be limited, but of course, Wikipedia is not paper and is a source for all types of obscure information. Wikipedia has been a great educational tool for me, and I generally pick up all kinds of “useless” information. Why the harsh anti-Asot rhetoric?"
 * This is what I responded... - user:zanimum
 * "I've posted this on vfd. Only you and your family have interest in such a company, whereas other so called "useless information" is of interest to hundreds, thousands, millions of people. More than just you family of five, or whatever. Give me an example. - Nick"