Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspect (Dungeons & Dragons) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  18:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Aspect (Dungeons & Dragons)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to establish notability. The only sources are primary. TTN (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Another D&D article that was already deleted at an AFD, and then restored by an IP user without consensus. While the current article may be substantially different than the one that one initially deleted, it is still a complete failure of the WP:GNG, considering that the only sources are non-independent game material.  Rorshacma (talk) 20:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, the article fails GNG, being sourced entirely to primary sources. Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:05, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the GNG Chetsford (talk) 01:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the previous AfD. The sourcing in the article hasn't improved at all. Not a very active user (talk) 06:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. DnD cruft that fails at NFICTION/GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.