Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspen Creek (restaurant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Aspen Creek (restaurant)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Some shallow coverage but no depth. A lot of the sources seem to be dead. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep – Meets WP:GNG. WP:CORPDEPTH
 * Nation's Restaurant News
 * Nation's Restaurant News
 * Courier-Journal
 * WDRB News
 * Star-Telegram
 * Dallas Morning News (short article)
 * – Northamerica1000(talk) 14:08, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, enough coverage of this small chain concept to pass GNG    but I suggest a merge and redirect to Texas Roadhouse, its more obviously notable parent, especially since Texas Roadhouse has already turned one of its Aspen Creek restaurants (in Fayetteville, NC) into yet another  new concept called Bubba's 33  .  --Arxiloxos (talk) 14:19, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as Arxiloxos has suggested. The TR article is not very long and can handle a section on this name w/o annoying readers of TR. Paavo273 (talk) 00:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment This AfD was posted 39 minutes and 10 seconds after the PROD was removed.  There is no discussion on the talk page.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Category:All articles to be merged currently shows the backlog at 11,429.  The process for proposing mergers is at WP:PM.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Deadlinks can be marked by the nominator while preparing the community for a deletion discussion.  Deadlinks can be WP:RS, just harder to locate.  Unscintillating (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The nominator was notified in the removal of the PROD that, "appears to meet WP:CORPDEPTH, per source searches".  Unscintillating (talk) 20:01, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH because the sources are routine announcements and reviews which are specifically excluded in that policy. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.