Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspiring Minds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  23:02, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Aspiring Minds

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A promotional artcle for a non notable company. Fails WP:NORG and WP:ORGDEPTH. All references are primary sources. Hagennos ❯❯❯  Talk  02:41, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep the company has received significant coverage in third party sources and it meets WP:NORG. Content was likely written by an undisclosed COI editor and needs to be toned down to maintain a neutral tone however. Cait.123 (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Could you please provide some instances where the coverage is not sourced to the company itself (like interviews or viewpoints form Company officials). A WP:BEFORE could not find anything.  --  Hagennos  ❯❯❯  Talk  05:50, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete--Typical spam/PR sourcing.Nothing semblant to independent coverage. ~ Winged Blades Godric 06:21, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:49, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete -- fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP and in general promotional 'cruft. Nothing close to meeting notability guidelines for corporations. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom and above, fails WP:NCORP  HighKing++ 12:03, 21 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.