Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assück


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus -- JForget 23:30, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Assück

 * – (View AfD) (View log) Fails WP:MUSIC. Seems to be just an advertisement article to promote an unknown band. No references to back up claims of grandeur: "They were one of the most important North American extreme metal bands and still have a strong cult following"  Scar ian  Talk  17:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * SPeedy delete. A7 IMHO would be fine, but they also assert the importance - they just don't deliver the goods. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Speedy was declined unfortunately. Scar ian  Talk  20:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Probably because of that assertion. Ah, well. Still, my !vote stands. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 20:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete unless someone can come up with better reliable sources than I was able to - a two-paragraph Rockdetector bio and a discography on Rollingstone.com. Unverifiable at present. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:14, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, present on Allmusic as well Aaronbrick (talk) 02:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that Allmusic is a sign of notability. It's kind of like calling a presence in the white pages a sign of notability. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 17:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ja, having a page on Allmusic does not guarantee or assert notability. Scar ian  Talk  22:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete nn subject. Fair Deal (talk) 03:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already stated above. Seal Clubber 01:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The band is to important User:Crustbastard 5:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Poor article and unreferenced; still, they were a pretty big underground band with many releases, toured the country, and got non-trivial coverage in major zines like Maximumrocknroll. No, I don't have the references, but deleting this article would be exceedingly hasty, especially since the article was tagged for lack of references only 3 hours before this AfD started. Precious Roy (talk) 16:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep-based simply sparse mentions in a couple of notable media sources. Peter Fleet (talk) 09:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage in Maximum RocknRoll and Allmusic is pretty good for a well-known underground grindcore band; the genre, despite having a loyal fanbase, doesn't get covered in Rolling Stone or Newsweek more than once a lifetime. Chubbles (talk) 14:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.