Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assault and Peppered


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, with no prejudice to an appropriate merge being agreed upon. There is consensus here that this is notable enough to be covered somewhere and not deleted. Davewild (talk) 07:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Assault and Peppered

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The subject doesn't seem notable enough to have its own article. Instead, it might be better to either delete it, or create a list of episodes, inlcuding this one. StaticGull Talk  12:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Daffy duck episodes are inherently notable. This needs a rewrite-- something I've been doing in the wake of this new editors efforts at creation. I'll be back after lunch to get my thoughts together. Basically per the arguments presented in Articles_for_deletion/Go_Go_Amigo and other related discussions. I wasn't going to edit today, but will make the time to attempt a rescue. There is a List of Daffy Duck cartoons. At worst, gut the plot summary and add real world information (as I've done with some of the creator's other efforts), and merge to the list. Do we have a Daffy Duck Wikiproject? Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  15:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Expanded rationale after lunch. They are notable as a huge part of animation history. There is also significant coverage online and even a Google book reference. The article is now rewritten with real world info that is verifiably sourced. The plot summary  is gone. Cheers,   Dloh  cierekim  16:40, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - nothing but a poorly written plot summery. Daffy duck episodes are inherently not notable --T-rex 16:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Daffy Duck cartoons. I'm not seeing that every Daffy Duck cartoon is inherently notable. If reliable sources turn up showing notability for this one, I'll gladly go to keep.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  20:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and tag for expansion - Warner Brothers theatrical cartoons are notable per their listings in various movie databases. Granted, this is one of the weakest on the Warner Brothers collection (it was actually made by DePatie-Freleng for Warner Brothers, which had just closed its cartoon studios), but Wikipedia doesn't make value judgments as to cartoon quality/quality regarding inclusion/exclusion. The article needs expansion regarding plot and production details, but that's not a reason to delete. B.Wind (talk) 05:36, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. I'm leaning towards redirecting, but it seems as if the list of episodes is mostly red linked.  Redirecting these articles to the list would require obtaining a summary of these episodes.  --Sigma 7 (talk) 00:25, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.