Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assault on the Senses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:09, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Assault on the Senses

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unremarkable book, article was created by one 'MF022181', it hardly takes a genius to put that with the author, Michael P. Ferrari, combined with his birth date of 21 February 1981 (that is all assumption, but near certain). The book has no coverage in independent sources, and is a bit promotional to boot. 1Potato2Potato3Potato4 (talk) 17:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. PROD contested by the author, but nothing to show evidence of notability.-- Mojo Hand (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant coverage exists. SL93 (talk) 23:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Other than this review, I couldn't really find anything usable to show notability. The article asserts that the book got a review from Beau Smith, but without the actual review we can't really verify how in-depth the actual review actually was. Was it an actual review? A blurb? This is pretty much why we need to be able to verify the sources- there's a big difference between the two. This may sound too distrustful, but I've seen cases where someone briefly mentioned something (book, movie, etc) in a manner that was clearly not a review, only for someone to try to use it as such. I even came across one instance where a media outlet reprinted a press release and someone tried to use the PR reprint as a review. This is why we need to verify sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:12, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.