Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assembly of Dust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Assembly of Dust
This is partly technical and partly because there is no assertion of notability for this band. There is an extensive history of this article being deleted and recreated, hence the "technical" aspect of this nomination. One of the deletions was because the article was a copyright violation. It needs more than a "speedy" delete in the circumstances. If the article is deleted, it ought to be protected. Agent 86 22:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - [|OF|DUST&sql=11:zy548qxzbtn4~T2 8 albums] listed on allmusic, [64K] google hits. Albums for sale on amazon admittedly have low sales ranks and most albums are live recordings but they do seem to meet the two or more albums on a notable label part of WP:BAND ( paraphrasing the policy there a bit ) - Peripitus (Talk) 03:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The article does not contain even an assertion of notability at WP:BAND levels.  GRBerry 03:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of notability assertions. The band's listing on allmusic.com has no biographical details, and all the albums are simply recorded concerts.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 16:29, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of notability that would satisfy WP:BAND. The recording label(s) for the two albums are not even listed in the article.  --Satori Son 18:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.