Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assertion theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Assertion theory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Personal essay, original research, primary sourced promotion. Page has two parts. First is as originaly started. Simple dicdef of what appears to be a summary of a paper coining the concept. This part has no independent coverage. Second part developed later is a persal essay exploring assertion. This essay is not about the claimed theory, just assertion itself. The sources used other than that first paper do not discuss "Assertion theory". duffbeerforme (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 14:20, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails, oh, pick any acronym &mdash; WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a hosting provider for psychobabble, and throwing in unrelated citations to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy does not actually help. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:21, 22 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.