Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assets (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:51, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Assets (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable magazine, no reliable independent sources, fails WP:GNG, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 23:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 23:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Advert, with no indication of notability. . . Mean as custard (talk) 09:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete no refs, no claim of notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.