Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asshole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep. -- howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 19:15, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Asshole
Delete. unnecessary dictionary definition of slang term, poorly written, much of the page is off-topic ("Asshat" is not a synonym for "Asshole"). wikipediatrix 02:45, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, as I'm thinking the nominator likely wasn't farmiliar with Wikipedia conventions on this sort of thing. The word is clearly quite notable and articles about words (even slang words) are encyclopedic if they go into depth about the word's history, use in society, etc.  Wikipedia even has an article about mother fucker.  Blackcats 02:51, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep notable slang term --Jaranda wat's sup 03:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above two recomentdations. Jamie 03:43, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep without perhaps some slight modifications. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 04:13, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. User:Zoe|(talk) 04:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or/and Transwiki to Wiktionary if it isn't already there. karmafist 04:22, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep as cultural significance. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy  Darwikinian Eventualist 05:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean-up. Goes beyond dicdef and is just as worthy as fuck or cunt.  Movementarian 11:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Sheesh. Notable. -- негідний лють  ( Reply 14:34, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * [Rotort omitted]... um... keep! &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  14:40, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but clean it up. Just as notable as fuck, which has an article. Introgressive 14:47, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - this article is more than a dictdef. Just expanded on Dennis Leary references. Capitalistroadster 16:37, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitely useful. Raelus 16:39, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.