Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AssiTrack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete a7 (product, company, and website names are all the same), g11 ad.  NawlinWiki (talk) 16:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

AssiTrack

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A 19-day old product is not yet notable. Clearly a case of WP:TOOSOON Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. It doesn't help that all the sources are from the company's website.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 03:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete New issue tracker with no evidence of attained notability; fails WP:NSOFT. AllyD (talk) 06:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:Too soon and WP:GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SefBau (talk • contribs) 06:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails to have multiple reliable sources, non-notable. Superman7515 (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.