Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assisted fishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I considered userfying but the page creator has been blocked. If anybody else wants to bang on this article just ask me. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Assisted fishing

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Disputed PROD. Concern was "No evidence at all of notability". The article describes a film that has not yet been released. Consequently, reliable third-party sources are triflingly few and distantly far between. Article does not assert notability. Subject fails WP:NF and, currently, WP:NFF.  Claret Ash  12:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails notability guidelines, not to mention that the article smacks of WP:ADVERT and especially WP:COI since the article's creator is producing the movie. They also advertised on their website that they started a page for their own movie on their facebook page., I also noticed that someone removed the proposed deletion tag purely because they worked on the movie without actually improving the article. If/when the movie becomes notable it can be re-created, but at this point in time it isn't notable per the nomination reasons. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * As a pre-emptive strike against someone coming on here to vote stack, I want to emphasize ahead of time that AfD is not a vote. You can make your argument as to why the article should remain, but in the end an administrator goes over the arguments and decides based upon the strengths of what was said. I also want any potential visitors to visit WP:MOVIE, WP:CRYSTAL, and WP:GNG. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Delete. No reliable sources were provided and I am unable to find any. This could change in the future but that's not a rationale for keeping the article now.  Rnb  (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Where are reliable and independent sources with substantial coverage needed to satisfy WP:N, let alone the arduous notability standard required for a film, Notability (films)? Edison (talk) 21:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Userfy. As film is completed and slated for a release in 3 months, I think we might politely return this to its author for cleanup per WP:NotJustYet. When it is released and receives coverage, a return to article space can be considered. Toward showing its author what article format is preferred, I just went through and gave it a cleanup to address its tone and style. In userspace, I would hope he can continue based upon my work.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.