Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associate specialist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Associate specialist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guidelines. This article has been unsourced since 2006 and upon a google search I have not found much that expands this beyond a glorified dictionary definition. Coin945 (talk) 04:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 05:04, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 05:29, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 05:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 05:32, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. No refs in the article. Never heard of it, just a title which stopped getting used. A dicdef probably. Szzuk (talk) 21:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This can be defined in another article in just one or two sentences. Natureium (talk) 18:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.