Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associated Society of Youth Engaged in Politics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete and salt per WP:N, and because these articles are nothing but a source of disruption. As an aside, OTRS Ticket#2009083110046201, 'demands the deletion' of all of these articles. I see no reason why we can't comply in this case. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Associated Society of Youth Engaged in Politics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to meet notability criteria. Rd232 talk 15:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect against recreation. Part of the latest round of Profound Intent spam, not notable. SirFozzie (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt per SirFozzie. I have been unable to uncover any coverage in reliable sources about this society. See the long history of disruption at Articles for deletion/Larry Pretlow II for why this article should be salted. Cunard (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. As the creator of this article, I ask that this article not be deleted. Please allow time for additional references and sources to be added. Also, this article is not a part of any spamming. Please understand I am not working with or affiliated with the subject. Thanks Dc archivist (talk) 22:21, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hard to believe you have no connection with the subject, given your contributions. Zip to date on anything not connected with the subject. Rd232 talk 22:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * ,, and numerous other times this has been up says differently. Even if it was not part of a spamming campaign it does not qualify for a Wikipedia article under Notabilitystandards. And considering the edit that was just made, I would be very suspicious if any new accounts popped in with a "Keep per DCArchivist" message. SirFozzie (talk) 22:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes, I am the creator of this article, why would I not support that it be kept! No, I have no connection with the subject, but I do follow these subjects and I think the subjects are notable for articles. As the creator, I would continue to maintenance the article, as should anyone else. I've created other articles as well; it is my goal to highlight the noteworthy progress of these subjects with their inclusions on Wikipedia. I’m sure these subjects could care less if there were any Wikipedia articles on them. With all due respect, this site is becoming less creditable each day, and to focus on Larry Pretlow II and all things pertaining is somewhat controversial. College students are not even allowed to cite Wikipedia, simply because this is a problem much bigger than my subjects. So, have your way, do what you want with the articles. Thanks again for your time! Dc archivist (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.