Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Associated Students of the University of Hawaii


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, consensus is that the article fails the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Associated Students of the University of Hawaii

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable local student government association. No real reliable sources (just links to alumni pages and school site.) Makes no assertion of notability. Original research. SevernSevern (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. &mdash; Noetic  Sage  18:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge into Section 6.2.1 of University of Hawai'i University of Hawaii at Manoa. This article is not notable on its own.   - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  21:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hawaii-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hers fold  (t/a/c) 17:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ORG Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 19:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails organizational notability guidelines by not supplying secondary sources. It doesn't appear that there are many potential reliable sources on the net either. The content of the article isn't worth merging because it is poorly worded and deals with alumni that are most likely already mentioned in the main article.— Noetic  Sage  22:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:ORG. The organization does not achieve notability just from some of its former officers becoming prominent people. Two of the external links, which describe the careers of two of those former officers, don't even mention this organization. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.