Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association "Woman and Society"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Association "Woman and Society"

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to meet WP:ORG. No evidence of coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG. Kinu t/c 16:35, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

 -
 * Keep: What's the hurry? It's just 3 months old. I added an English link for those interested. Whatever happened to Wikipedia trying to have a more inclusive world view? Not to mention taking women's efforts more seriously. Thanks. CarolMooreDC (talk) 13:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Having a greater worldview and upholding notability standards are not mutually exclusive goals. What policy- or guideline-based arguments support inclusion of this article? -- Kinu  t/c 16:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It doesn't pass the criteria at WP:ORG. I've also tried searching for it under its Russian title (Ассоциации Женщина и Общество), and cannot find independent coverage. Willing to change my mind, if references show up to support claims to notability. Voceditenore (talk) 11:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I also did a more generic search on Google books for women's+rights+Tajikistan and still nothing turns up on this particular organization, although there is a lot of material on the general subject and this source lists many NGOs in Tajikistan which work in this area, but does not list this one. I'd suggest on article on Status of women in Tajikistan or expanding Human rights in Tajikistan. Taking a more inclusive world view and taking women's efforts more seriously is not incompatible with upholding notability guidelines, but it in this case, a strong argument for this particular NGO cannot really be made.Voceditenore (talk) 12:14, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.