Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails Notability as per WP:ORG and copy vio of www.aopt.org ''' Flat Out   let's discuss it   00:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable society. It exists, it publishes a journal, it has meetings, but I could find no evidence that its existence has been taken note of by independent reliable sources, so it fails WP:ORG. --MelanieN (talk) 21:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 13:39, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Comment - They also publish their own journal, Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Notability (academic journals) can also be used to provide notability. The copyvio needs to be fixed. Some of the websites in the external links to mention this association. I'll try to add references and other improvements to this article. Star6763 (talk) 11:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * mild Keep - It has minor mention from other organizations, some of those are included from organizations in external links. There is mention, but not enough information from those mentions to add to article. However, opinion on this not strong. Star6763 (talk) 11:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.