Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association for the Defense of Animals and Nature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Spam from globally locked user who was probably socking. An established editor is welcome to create an article of this Association is in fact notable. Star  Mississippi  17:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Association for the Defense of Animals and Nature

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Blatant WP:PROMO. As it is, fails WP:NCORP. Jalen Folf  (talk)  08:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions.  Jalen Folf   (talk)  08:13, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of external references. Rathfelder (talk) 10:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there may be "external references" but that does not mean that they are suitable for establishing notability and that is hte case here. This is nothing more than a paid for puff piece about a non notable org. PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The creator has been globally locked for spamming. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete there is no sources, it should be deleted, it is not notable. Chip3004 (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - The NPR source seems to be the only one offering the sort of coverage we need, the rest are minor coverage, interviews & a student-run blog. Source search is turning up the same items, likely injected as a refbomb to help save the article. I might have said draftify instead, but it seems that's already been attempted, and the article as it is written is promotional and does not meet our standards. (Note- there are sources available that mention the topic, they're just not sufficient) Note 2: Given the fast pace this is moving at, the global block and now a paid tag, I can see this heading into WP:SNOW territory. ASUKITE 14:44, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - Just noting that the creator has also made multiple drafts & redirects of this material, some of which but not all have been removed. This really looks like a spamy attempt to create variations of the article with every possible title for SEO. Regardless of the decision here these need cleanup. These are the 3 actives I can find, there might be more.  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:ADAN&redirect=no  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Association_for_the_Defense_of_Animals_and_Nature&redirect=no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Foundation_ADAN  JamesG5 (talk) 17:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
 * tagged for CSD. This could also be an IAR speedy, but unclear if it's a G5. Star   Mississippi  16:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * @Star Mississippi I'm pretty sure these are all socks of this user anyway. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You understand global locks, etc. better than almost anyone else. I will take out the trash. Thanks for flagging. Star   Mississippi  17:10, 13 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.