Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Accounting Technicians Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I don't like deleting an article on such thin discussion, but I don't see anything here that would justify keeping it. If somebody wants to take a shot at researching sources and writing a better article, ping me and I'll be happy to restore this to draft space for you to work on. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Association of Accounting Technicians Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet relevant notability guidelines and lacks non-trivial coverage from independent reliable sources. Allied45 (talk) 07:21, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  07:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  07:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  07:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, w umbolo   ^^^  09:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  01:13, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per nom. Legion X (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There are a lot of very reliable mentions to be found, ie, from other professional bodies, government departments, and major educational institutions.  However, it would be difficult to write an in-depth article, although from what I saw the current article could be improved from the current micro stub.  Aoziwe (talk) 07:37, 5 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.