Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Association of Seventh-day Adventist Librarians (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:10, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Association of Seventh-day Adventist Librarians
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't establish that this is WP:NOTABLE or even worth a merge. Tagged for notability for 8 years, no consensus at AfD 3 years ago; hopefully we can now get it resolved. Boleyn (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Few to no reliable sources found; fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 19:54, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment -- The previous AFD was closed with no consensus, after votes both ways. It certainly exists.  The question is whether it is notable.  It seems to undertake some kind of abstracting service and have a conference, but I see nothing to indicate size or anything else to show it is notable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:56, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I created this originally; now retired from Wikipedia. But yes it is probably not ″notable″ in the Wikipedia sense. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 06:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - even the creator agrees it's NN. Bearian (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.