Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assorted Jelly Beans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Richard Falomir. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:33, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Assorted Jelly Beans

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The put a db-band tag on this and I agree with the hammer. But an article that has survived this long is entitled to an AfD discussion. How come that in the eleven years of this article's existence no-one has added independent evidence of notability? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * it probably didn't help that the article has never been tagged with any WikiProjects on its talk page, and therefore nobody knew that it existed. Richard3120 (talk) 22:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, it was, RHaworth just forgot to undelete the talk page when he restored the article. I have done so now. Regards  So Why  06:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah OK, my apologies. Richard3120 (talk) 06:59, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:45, 22 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per my initial tagging. Searching for the band with various search terms turned up no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:42, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Clearly not a case of db-band with being signed to a notable label, releasing two albums on said major indie label (which has a roster of notable bands) and having notable members, all of which would make it pass WP:BAND easily. The lack of sources is not a reason to speedy delete, especially after such a long time with a subject that was mainly active before the internet era. Even if sources were missing (did not have time to check), WP:ATD clearly is against deletion here: We have both Richard Falomir (notable former member) and Kung Fu Records as suitable merge/redirect target without even having to think much further. Regards  So Why  06:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment. A redirect to Richard Falomir would be reasonable. The only coverage I found was a very brief bio from Allmusic and a very brief review from the same site. --Michig (talk) 08:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.