Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assorted Nuts Animation Studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn. LibStar (talk) 06:28, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Assorted Nuts Animation Studios

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

blatantly fails WP:CORP. sources are mostly primary. hardly anything in gnews LibStar (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep A search using the Norwegian Kvasir search engine found multiple independent articles about the company, mostly in Swedish but including a couple in an English-language trade journal. I'm not sure of the status of the Streamy award in respect to establishing notability, but I believe this meets the GNG. It already had at least two independent sources, but they were hard to see among all the other bare URLs - I've added several refs and a little information and identified those two, and will do some more work on the article. --Yngvadottir (talk) 14:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Established and independently verified. Noted also in established media, Strike TV, Animation magazine; one of the studios creations is signed to EMI; the studio has syndicated series on American animation network Toon Goggles; one of the studios creations is noted as the world's first animated blogger; Streamy Award winner. The recently improved refs help. Archive List (talk) 23:59, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.