Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assume bad faith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate wasmoved to WP:MFD. NSLE ( T + C + CVU ) 10:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Assume bad faith

 * Delete. Pointless page that doesn't belong in the Wikipedia namespace, nor on Wikipedia at all. - Andrew Northall 09:05, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. The article has been around for several months, all the while pointing out that it is intended as humor and is supposed to be the OPPOSITE way in which Wikipedians should think. It is, admittedly, a very weak candidate for the Wikipedia namespace, and I do not throw my full support behind it, though I think it is a fun little Wikipedian Easter Egg. --Frag 09:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * comment: This nomination shouldn't be here - please take it to WP:MFD Grutness...wha?  09:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, article is properly marked as a humor page. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 10:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.