Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astadia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Astadia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Yet another case of not-quite-unambiguous adverspam. All references are internal to the company as far as I can tell, and the page is just a list of products. The article has been up for a month, and hasn't been touched in over three and a half weeks. Tyrenon (talk) 07:46, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: The company gets mentions in some reliable sources, but one is fleeting, and the other is just placement in a chart. No meaningful notability is apparent. — Bdb484 (talk) 08:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article uses mostly reliable sources and contains unbiast and factual data. It is data someone researching Astadia would desire and is not advertising. — anonymous] ([[User talk:anonymous|talk) 03:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.121.168 (talk)  {(spa|24.126.121.168}}

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 13:58, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't look notable. 71.3.53.121 (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC) User:71.3.53.121 made 19 WP:JUSTAVOTE and WP:JNN AfD recommendations in less than 30 minutes after being templated as a single-purpose account on WP:Articles for deletion/Chain smoking — Rankiri (talk) 16:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, I'd be inclined to G12 (spam) this one. Very much corporate promotion and little else. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 17:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.