Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aston Demolition


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Aston Demolition

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Most are completely unsourced, a couple have a single, primary source which is the team's website. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT and WP:RAWDATA. Full of redlinks and some have broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Wikipedia is WP:NOTWEBHOST. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all: No evidence that any of these putative teams meet the GNG. I ran an even dozen of them through Google News -- one would think if they could garnish any coverage, they'd do so in the lively sports presses of cities like Boston, Philadelphia, St. Louis, Denver and the like -- and couldn't find a single hit outside of the respective Wikipedia articles.   Ravenswing   04:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack notability. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - unsourced, non-notable, no reason to keep these on WP. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:06, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete all. All teams totally non notable. I have also added the remaining AfD templates to the articles. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.