Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aston Oxborough


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 07:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Aston Oxborough

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NFOOTY, fails WP:NBIO OGLV (talk) 22:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. OGLV (talk) 22:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number   5  7  08:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked through the sources, there were quite a few there, but it's pretty much routine stuff, nothing extensive, nothing remotely interesting!! Fails GNG if you ask me. Govvy (talk) 12:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:GNG requires significant coverage from sources independent of the subject but I can barely find anything outside of Norwich City's own website Canaries.co.uk Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:34, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG, even if he fails NFOOTY. And being reserve goalkeeper for a pro side must mean something in my opinion.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:26, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep As per comment above. Finch14 (talk) 07:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 16:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. GNG is the only relevant guideline here and it is definitely not met. JoelleJay (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep passes GNG - there's lots of coverage, which isn't surprising as a backup keeper for a top Championship team. Such as this. Nfitz (talk) 20:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
 * How is that significant coverage? The sum total of info on him there is Barely 3 sentences covering his youth activity (plus a quote from him and someone else) in a local paper -- almost anyone could achieve that. JoelleJay (talk) 17:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I count 6 of 8 paragraphs. Scroll down past the ads. Nfitz (talk) 21:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you mean the quotes from Oxborough himself, which definitely don't contribute to notability?Or the quote from the U16 player that just namedrops him? JoelleJay (talk) 22:17, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I disagree with you. Nfitz (talk) 23:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG and NFOOTBALL.4meter4 (talk) 15:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.