Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astound Commerce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Astound Commerce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant, in-depth coverage in independent, reliable sources. Referenced to press release and primary sources. Mduvekot (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 18:36, 27 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - Cited sources are not WP:INDEPENDENT. I was unable to find sufficient coverage elsewhere. ~Kvng (talk) 17:45, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.