Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astral Projection (Charmed)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:34, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Astral Projection (Charmed)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Cruft, original research. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's nothing specific about the concept on the show that 1) deserves its own article, and 2) isn't already covered by Astral projection.  Ford MF 06:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, charmedcruft. Lankiveil 12:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete - per nom. Otto4711 13:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Wave a magic wand and make it vanish - Since this is at the extreme end of fancruft. A1octopus 14:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- completely not notable Patar knight 22:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Doesn't need its own article. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, I had already tried to redirect it to astral projection.~ZytheTalk to me! 15:41, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, separate article is unnecessary, as there is already a perfectly acceptable "List of terms" article. -- Huntster  T • @ • C 16:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Is there a reason why you brought this to AfD? Zythe had already redirected this page to the Astral Projection article and you reverted it and brought it here instead. You could've just left it as a redirect and saved everyone some time. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 20:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Check the history, this article was nominated for deletion before Zythe attempted a redirect. Using a redirect is a lazy way to avoid dealing with a problem article as it allows for reversion to previous content. "Astral Projection (Charmed)" is a useless search term anyway, who would type that exact phrase in the search box? ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.