Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astral dreadnought (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  18:44, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Astral dreadnought
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Formerly deleted, and then restored and continuously reverted back and forth over many years. This still fails to establish notability. On all important points, it is no better off than it was in 2008, so this AfD is an act of pointless bureaucracy. If the outcome is delete and redirect or redirect, the redirect should be protected after. TTN (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable and per WP:GAMEGUIDE. Salt to prevent recreation. -- Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Yet another previously deleted D&D article that was restored without consensus by an IP. Coverage of this creature outside of primary sources is trivial, and provides no real information outside of affirming that it exists.  Fails the WP:GNG.  Rorshacma (talk) 20:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of SIGCOV in RS Chetsford (talk) 04:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the previous AfD, the article's subject still has no real-world notability. Not a very active user (talk) 06:28, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. DnD cruft that fails at NFICTION/GNG. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:03, 28 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.