Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrid Award


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was No consensus. Keep argument appears to be the most valid.  Citi Cat   ♫ 03:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Astrid Award

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously prodded and de-prodded a couple of times. Notability issues Montchav (talk) 22:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. although most of the ghits are from organizations announcing their own receipt of the award, but it is apparently important to major non-commercial bodies as well ; additionally, 3rd party news sources seem to find it significant enough to report:, ; DGG (talk) 01:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete There is not enough here for an article. The award may become notable and then it could have an article. --Stormbay (talk) 21:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The absence of dialogue on this article may speak to a lack of notability. --Stormbay (talk) 03:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sources have been shown that discuss the award itself, its history, its origins, its importance, et cetera.  Without any, we must presume the award itself isn't notable.  Mango juice talk 16:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.