Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrid Peth (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Astrid Peth
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

For the same reasons suggested for Adam Mitchell. Companion has only appeared in a single episode and fails to warrant an article of her own. magnius (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep- Hardly your typical one-shot character. Plenty of out of universe information in the article meeting the WP:GNG by light years. That its also considered a Good Article also works heavilly in its favor. Umbralcorax (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep- although I would typically say merge for a simple one episode character, there is enough info here to warrent its own article and enough references to justify notability.  Gtstricky Talk or C 16:47, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 19:05, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep GA articles need to be delisted before being nominated for deletion. Keep it anyway per the other information in the article. Jclemens (talk) 19:57, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep one episode character but there are enough sources to WP:verify notability including reception. Might merge to the article about the episode itself but that can be discussed later. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.