Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrogenomics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to astrobiology. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Astrogenomics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTABILITY - a neologism with just over 100 unique Google hits, most of which are database listings of the paper it's from, or other uses of the term (website names, email addresses) Nat Gertler (talk) 14:27, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to astrobiology. The caption of the lead image there seems to be on this topic (though not this name), so that article already has relevant info on astrobiological genomics, and would be a better location for further information than a separate article. Chris857 (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Chris857. This does not have enough reliable third party coverage for its own article. However I am not adverse to recreating in the future should it be discussed outside of the narrow field.Martin 4 5 1  21:55, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: As nominator, I'd be fine with redirect instead of deletion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:35, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.