Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astrology with Squidward


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Astrology with Squidward

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 16:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:28, 4 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment. Bumper (broadcasting) is tagged with Expand section and mentions Nickelodeon. Might be a better merge target. – wbm1058 (talk) 16:31, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, no redirect. Unnotable continuity which just filled thirty seconds a commercial did. The Nick bumper mention above should be about solely their 'you're watching' promos of the 80s and 90s, not no-effort redubs of short scenes of cartoons with unrelated content like this was.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment And after some surgical cuts to the article (including a fake 'episode list' and a bunch of inane unsourced trivia, along with a link to a random YouTube video)...the article is really, really thin.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 14:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I have no objections to the proposal to delete this. Noting that we're here because of the edits of FireChamp, whose only two edits were to this article. wbm1058 (talk) 17:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Please don't denigrate a new editor who likely thought this might have some notability outside the SB community. I have absolutely no issue with them, just that the topic can't be rescued.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 16:25, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. No references in the article.  My own searching failed to find any WP:RS.  Lots of blogs, wikis, and other WP:UGC, but nothing we can use.  I was amused (but not particularly surprised) to discover that there's several wikis devoted entirely to Sponge Bob.  Spongepedia???  -- RoySmith (talk) 15:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.