Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asylum (Disturbed song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If anyone wants it in their userspace, let me know. Courcelles (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Asylum (Disturbed song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article for new-released single that has not yet gained notability. See WP:NSONG &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  22:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  13:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. WP:MUSIC explicitly states that failing to meet notability guidelines doesn't necessarily make something eligible for deletion. The mentioned guideline (A7) doesn't apply to creative works. Davidjcobb (talk) 06:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Notability is not inherited, and the creator of the article has never bothered to make any sort of claim other than that "it's a single, and it's by this band I like, and you can buy it at iTunes!" none of which constitutes an assertion, much less evidence, of any kind of notability. It's bad enough that we have this defacto bias that any album released in the US or UK by a "notable" band is inherently notable; now we've got a tendency to make the same assumption about singles! -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no notability, not even a claim to notability... and it doesn't matter whether it meets A7 or not (or A9, which is the most relevant CSD), this is AFD, not speedy. Hairhorn (talk) 00:54, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The song itself doesn't have enough notability to deserve an article. Even if it's from a band like Disturbed, even if it was from Michael Jackson, a song itself doesn't deserve an article unless it haves enough notability to have one. (For example, being played in a famous film.) -Rambard (talk) 12:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.