Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AtGoogleTalks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

AtGoogleTalks

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was previously mentioned in the Google article. It was discussed in the Google article's talk page and has been removed by. He could not find any reliable sources at all. DBZFan30 (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   11:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi! I was considering nominating this article for deletion myself, but having no experience doing that, I chose to only delete the info from the Google article. I'm happy to see others taking responsibility for nominating, because I really do think this article should be removed. My explanation over at the Google talk page is pretty much exactly my thoughts: An almost total lack of decent sources. The AtGoogleTalks article has a template for needing citations since May 2008, and in the almost 10 years since that, there are yet to be adequate sources for this topic. I tried to do research for finding information, but I was unable to find any reliable, published sources. I think the article is just sitting and gathering dust waiting for sources that will never arrive. LocalNet (talk) 11:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.